Serviciul de Informatii Externe
Domnule Razvan Ungureanu
Avand bunavointa domnului L.Pavoni consulul general dinNew York v-am trimis o scrisoare. In ea am cerut o audienta cu dumneavoa sau o convorbire cu o persoana delegata. Cu aceasta oceasta ocazie am vrut sa va prezint documente confidentiale despre Vladimir Tismaneanu.Documentele clarifica materialele aparute in presa care califica pe V.T. ca agent. Am vrut sa prezint deasemenea acordul meu ,si opinia comunitatii romane americane pe care o reprezint cu privire la necesitatea deportarii lui V.T. din Statele Unite. Dinsul a a ascuns serviciului de emigratie faptul ca a fost membru al partidului comunist si a scris articole in care cerea rasturnarea capitalismului si a sistemului politic american prin forta muschilor lui de comunist. Faptul ca a mintit sub juramant, va duce la automat la deportare .Mentionez ca in dosarul lui sunt si alte fapte agravante.Anexez doua materiale pertinente in acest caz pe care le-am facut chiar EU.
Motivul incercarii de a va contacta este extrem de serios. Dumneavoastra sunteti printre putinele persoane competente, care puteti spune adevarul presedintelui inainte de a fi prea tarziu ,pentru dansul si imaginea tarii pe care EU o iubesc tot timpul. Presedintela Traian Basescu trebue sa aiba acces la toate documentele si faptele acestui caz.Dinsul va avea posibilitata de a se distanta cit mai departe de clanul care care il minte ,manipuleaza si a cere scuze. Va fi iertat de MINE si de comunitatea pe care o reprezint In caz contrariu isi va semna singur, sinuciderea politica.
De si a trecut mult timp nu am primit nici in un raspuns. Acest lucru este grav si impotriva legii, care va obliga sa raspundeti oricarei srisori oficiale. Am avut o audienta cu Simona Miculescu ambasador la ONU nu demult (Au participat deasemenea consulul adjunct A.Berechet si adjunctul misiunii T. Morar) in care am discutat despre Tismaneanu si am cerut sa fiu contactat de SIE la orice nivel si la orice ora.Din nou fara nici un rezultat. Mentionez ca ca am discutat aceasta problema cu diplomatul Ilinca Ilie Ilie de ambasada de multe ori si cu consulul L.Pavoni chiar acum o ora.
Domnule director, ginditi-va-ti bine,
Faptul ca incercati sa blocati informatii despre un spion este de o gravitate exceptionala. Faptul ca nu lasati ca servici de informatii sa aiba acces la informatii trebue sa intre in atentia parlamentului.Cu alte cuvinte SIE nu este lasat sa-si faca datoria.
Este o ultima incercare. In caz contrariu voi trimite spre publicare articolul ,pe doua pagini “Deportarea agentului Volodea” ziarului New York Magazin si in mod sigur prietenii mei de la ANTENA TV il vor prelua imediat fara sa stea sa mai gindeasca.
IMMIGRATION-DEPORTATION
1. Anarchists;
2. Aliens advocating or teaching opposition to all organized government;
3. Aliens who are members of or affiliated with the Communist Party or any other totalitarian organization;
4. Aliens, not already covered by the preceding classes, advocating the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism;
5. Aliens advocating the overthrow, by force and violence, of the United States government, or any of its officers;
6. Aliens who write, publish, or distribute materials which are subversive;
7. Aliens who affiliate with persons who write, publish, or distribute subversive literature;
8. Aliens whom the Attorney General believes entered the United States principally or incidentally to engage in activities endangering the welfare, safety, or national security of the United States.
U.S. Supreme Court
Berenyi v. Immigration Director, 385 U.S. 630 (1967)
Berenyi v. Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
Petitioner, an alien who entered this country from Hungary in 1956, filed a petition for naturalization in 1962. In connection therewith, he denied under oath that he had been a member of the Communist Party, or that he had been connected or associated with the Party, either directly or indirectly. The Attorney General opposed the petition, and at the District Court hearing, produced two witnesses whose testimony indicated that petitioner had been a Party member in Hungary. Petitioner denied Party membership, and presented witnesses who testified to his opposition to Communism. The District Judge found that petitioner became a Party member in 1945, remained so for a number of years, attended Party meetings, and that petitioner had thus testified falsely in connection with his citizenship application. Since §§ 101(f) and 316(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act provide that an applicant who gives such false testimony is not “a person of good moral character” within the meaning of the Act, and is therefore ineligible for naturalization, the court denied petitioner’s citizenship application.
